Back to articles
Articles
Volume: 17 | Article ID: art00025_1
Image
Wettability Characterization of Printing Substrates: Facts and Interpretations
Abraham Marmur
  DOI :  10.2352/ISSN.2169-4451.2001.17.1.art00025_1  Published Online :  January 2001
Abstract

Methods for characterizing the wettability of printing substrates are discussed. These include characterization of porous substrates (e.g. paper) as well as non-porous substrates. Emphasis is put on explaining the theory behind each method, in order to enable distinction between established facts and less established interpretations. In some situations the theory itself is incomplete, therefore the characterization methods in these cases may and should be used on a comparative basis.

Journal Title : NIP & Digital Fabrication Conference
Publisher Name : Society of Imaging Science and Technology
Publisher Location : 7003 Kilworth Lane, Springfield, VA 22151, USA
Subject Areas :
Views 10
Downloads 0
 DOI 10.2352/ISSN.2169-4451.2001.17.1.art00025_1
 articleview.views 10
 articleview.downloads 0
  Cite this article 

Abraham Marmur, "Wettability Characterization of Printing Substrates: Facts and Interpretations"  in Proc. IS&T Int'l Conf. on Digital Printing Technologies (NIP17),  2001,  pp 129 - 132,  https://doi.org/10.2352/ISSN.2169-4451.2001.17.1.art00025_1

 Copy citation
  Copyright statement 
Copyright © Society for Imaging Science and Technology 2001
72010410
NIP & Digital Fabrication Conference
nip digi fabric conf
2169-4451
Society of Imaging Science and Technology
7003 Kilworth Lane, Springfield, VA 22151, USA
2169-4451(20010101)2001:1L.129;1-
nip_v2001n1/splitsection25.xml
/ist/nipdf/2001/00002001/00000001/art00025
Articles
Wettability Characterization of Printing Substrates: Facts and Interpretations
MarmurAbraham
01012001
2001
1
129
132
2001
Methods for characterizing the wettability of printing substrates are discussed. These include characterization of porous substrates (e.g. paper) as well as non-porous substrates. Emphasis is put on explaining the theory behind each method, in order to enable distinction between established facts and less established interpretations. In some situations the theory itself is incomplete, therefore the characterization methods in these cases may and should be used on a comparative basis.