Back to articles
Articles
Volume: 33 | Article ID: art00002
Image
Performance comparison of video encoders in light field image compression
Hadi Amirpour
Antonio M. G. Pinheiro
Manuela Pereira
Mohammad Ghanbari
  DOI :  10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2021.18.3DIA-060  Published Online :  January 2021
Abstract

Efficient compression plays a significant role in Light Field imaging technology because of the huge amount of data needed for their representation. Video encoders using different strategies are commonly used for Light Field image compression. In this paper, different video encoder implementations including HM, VTM, x265, xvc, VP9, and AV1 are analysed and compared in terms of coding efficiency, and encoder/decoder time-complexity. Light field images are compressed as pseudo-videos.

Journal Title : Electronic Imaging
Publisher Name : Society for Imaging Science and Technology
Publisher Location : IS&T 7003 Kilworth Lane, Springfield, VA 22151 USA
Subject Areas :
Views 47
Downloads 20
 DOI 10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2021.18.3DIA-060
 articleview.views 47
 articleview.downloads 20
  Cite this article 

Hadi Amirpour, Antonio M. G. Pinheiro, Manuela Pereira, Mohammad Ghanbari, "Performance comparison of video encoders in light field image compression"  in Proc. IS&T Int’l. Symp. on Electronic Imaging: 3D Imaging and Applications,  2021,  pp 60-1 - 60-7,  https://doi.org/10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2021.18.3DIA-060

 Copy citation
  Copyright statement 
Copyright © Society for Imaging Science and Technology 2021
72010604
Electronic Imaging
2470-1173
Society for Imaging Science and Technology
IS&T 7003 Kilworth Lane, Springfield, VA 22151 USA
10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2021.18.3DIA-060
2470-1173(20210118)2021:18L.601;1-
ei_24701173_v2021n18_input_r1/s6.xml
/ist/ei/2021/00002021/00000018/art00002
Articles
Performance comparison of video encoders in light field image compression
AmirpourHadi
PinheiroAntonio M. G.
PereiraManuela
GhanbariMohammad
18012021
2021
18
60-1
60-7
2021
Efficient compression plays a significant role in Light Field imaging technology because of the huge amount of data needed for their representation. Video encoders using different strategies are commonly used for Light Field image compression. In this paper, different video encoder implementations including HM, VTM, x265, xvc, VP9, and AV1 are analysed and compared in terms of coding efficiency, and encoder/decoder time-complexity. Light field images are compressed as pseudo-videos.
Light fieldvideo codecscompressionEfficiencyComplexity