Back to articles
Articles
Volume: 19 | Article ID: art00044
Image
Comparing automated and human ratings of photographic aesthetics
Ramakrishna Kakarala
Todd S. Sachs
Vittal Premachandran
  DOI :  10.2352/CIC.2011.19.1.art00044  Published Online :  January 2011
Abstract

ACQUINE has made automated rating of photographic aesthetics available on the web. We compare the influence of various factors, such as color, sharpness, and contrast, on the ratings that it gives. We also compare results with those given by human judges.

Journal Title : Color and Imaging Conference
Publisher Name : Society of Imaging Science and Technology
Publisher Location : 7003 Kilworth Lane, Springfield, VA 22151, USA
Subject Areas :
Views 12
Downloads 1
 DOI 10.2352/CIC.2011.19.1.art00044
 articleview.views 12
 articleview.downloads 1
  Cite this article 

Ramakrishna Kakarala, Todd S. Sachs, Vittal Premachandran, "Comparing automated and human ratings of photographic aesthetics"  in Proc. IS&T 19th Color and Imaging Conf.,  2011,  pp 217 - 222,  https://doi.org/10.2352/CIC.2011.19.1.art00044

 Copy citation
  Copyright statement 
Copyright © Society for Imaging Science and Technology 2011
72010350
Color and Imaging Conference
color imaging conf
2166-9635
Society of Imaging Science and Technology
7003 Kilworth Lane, Springfield, VA 22151, USA
2166-9635(20110101)2011:1L.217;1-
cic_v2011n1/splitsection44.xml
/ist/cic/2011/00002011/00000001/art00044
Articles
Comparing automated and human ratings of photographic aesthetics
KakaralaRamakrishna
SachsTodd S.
PremachandranVittal
01012011
2011
1
217
222
2011
ACQUINE has made automated rating of photographic aesthetics available on the web. We compare the influence of various factors, such as color, sharpness, and contrast, on the ratings that it gives. We also compare results with those given by human judges.