Back to articles
Proceedings Paper
Volume: 23 | Article ID: 9
Image
Physicometric Authentication Factors
  DOI :  10.2352/issn.2168-3204.2026.23.1.9  Published Online :  July 2026
Abstract
Abstract

Authentication of high-value cultural heritage objects relies primarily on legacy empirical frameworks developed prior to modern statistical decision theory, digital identity management, and multi-factor authentication (MFA). While conservation science provides diverse analytical techniques to evaluate material, structural, and chemical properties, these investigations typically operate as independent silos rather than components of a unified identity framework. Consequently, combining provenance, connoisseurship, and scientific analysis into a coherent protocol with quantifiable confidence levels remains an unaddressed challenge. This paper reformulates cultural heritage authentication as a statistical identity problem. Building on standards-based hyperspectral authentication and physical multi-factor frameworks, we formalize a new class of authentication factors called physicometric factors, defined as the measurement and statistical characterization of invariant physical properties of inanimate objects. These stable descriptors arise from an object's material composition, structural organization, fabrication history, and physical response to controlled interrogation. Examples include spectral reflectance, micro-topographic surface structure, chemical signatures, refractive index transitions, and fabrication-derived entropy patterns. To implement this framework, we introduce OMASIE (Optical Multiscale Aperture Synthesizing Invariant Extractor), an architecture employing structured illumination, coded apertures, and computational reconstruction to translate object responses into high-dimensional identity vectors suitable for statistical comparison. This methodology resolves measurement degeneracy, including metamerism and related ambiguities, through dimensional expansion, covariance-aware evidence fusion, and identity vector comparison. Beyond immediate verification, aggregating these physical identity vectors establishes a structured knowledge base to support retrospective scholarship, workshop attribution, and conservation monitoring.

Subject Areas :
Views 9
Downloads 0
 articleview.views 9
 articleview.downloads 0
  Cite this article 

Larry Kleiman, "Physicometric Authentication Factors"  in Archiving Conference,  2026,  pp 42 - 48,  https://doi.org/10.2352/issn.2168-3204.2026.23.1.9

 Copy citation
  Copyright statement 
Copyright ©2026 Society for Imaging Science and Technology 2026
archiving
Archiving Conference
2161-8798
2161-8798
Society for Imaging Science and Technology
IS&T 7003 Kilworth Lane, Springfield, VA 22151 USA