<?xml version="1.0"?>
                <!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
                <article article-type="research-article" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
                xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
                xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
                dtd-version="3.0">
                <front>
                    <journal-meta>
                    <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ei</journal-id>
                    <journal-title>Electronic Imaging</journal-title>
                    <issn pub-type="ppub">2470-1173</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2470-1173</issn>
                    <publisher>
                        <publisher-name>Society for Imaging Science and Technology</publisher-name>
                        <publisher-loc>IS&amp;T 7003 Kilworth Lane, Springfield, VA 22151 USA</publisher-loc>
                    </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                    <article-meta>
                    <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2352/EI.2024.36.5.MLSI-309</article-id>
                    <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">MLSI-309</article-id>
                    <article-categories>
                        <subj-group>
                        <subject>Proceedings</subject>
                        </subj-group>
                    </article-categories>
                    <title-group>
                        <article-title>What’s Wrong With End-to-End Learning For Phase Retrieval?</article-title>
                    </title-group><contrib-group content-type="all"><contrib contrib-type="author"><name>
                            <surname>Zhang</surname>
                            <given-names>Wenjie </given-names>
                           </name> <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1author1"/></contrib><aff id="aff1author1">University of Minnesota, US</aff></contrib-group><contrib-group content-type="all"><contrib contrib-type="author"><name>
                            <surname>Wan</surname>
                            <given-names>Yuxiang </given-names>
                           </name> <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1author2"/></contrib><aff id="aff1author2">University of Minnesota, US</aff></contrib-group><contrib-group content-type="all"><contrib contrib-type="author"><name>
                            <surname>Zhuang</surname>
                            <given-names>Zhong </given-names>
                           </name> <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2author3"/></contrib><aff id="aff2author3"> University of California</aff></contrib-group><contrib-group content-type="all"><contrib contrib-type="author"><name>
                            <surname>Sun</surname>
                            <given-names>Ju </given-names>
                           </name> <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1author4"/></contrib><aff id="aff1author4">University of Minnesota, US</aff></contrib-group><abstract>
                    <title>Abstract</title>
                    <p>For nonlinear inverse problems that are prevalent in imaging science, symmetries in the forward model are common. When data-driven deep learning approaches are used to solve such problems, such intrinsic symmetries can cause substantial learning difficulties. In this paper, we explain how such difficulties arise and, more importantly, how to overcome them by preprocessing the training set before any learning, i.e., symmetry breaking. We take the far-field Fourier phase retrieval, which is central to many areas of scientific imaging, as an example and show that symmetric breaking can substantially improve data-driven learning performance. We also formulate the principle of symmetry breaking that can lead to efficient learning. </p>
                    </abstract><pub-date>
                        <day>21</day>
                        <month>1</month>
                        <year>2024</year>
                        </pub-date><volume>36</volume>
                    <issue-acronym>MLSI</issue-acronym>
                    <issue-title>Machine Learning for Scientific Imaging 2024</issue-title>
                    <issue seq="309">5</issue>
                    <fpage>309-1</fpage>
                    <lpage>309-6</lpage>
                    <permissions>
                         <copyright-statement>© 2024, Society for Imaging Science and Technology</copyright-statement>
                        <copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
                    </permissions><kwd-group><kwd>Deep Learning</kwd><kwd>End-to-End Learning</kwd><kwd>Nonlinear Inverse Problems</kwd><kwd>Phase Retrieval</kwd><kwd>Symmetry Breaking</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta>
                </front>
                </article>