<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC '-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.1 20050630//EN' 'http://uploads.ingentaconnect.com/docs/dtd/ingenta-journalpublishing.dtd'>
<article article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="aggregator">72010604</journal-id>
      <journal-title>Electronic Imaging</journal-title>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2470-1173</issn><issn pub-type="epub"></issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Society for Imaging Science and Technology</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2016.8.MWSF-080</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="sici">2470-1173(20160214)2016:8L.1;1-</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">s16.phd</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="other">/ist/ei/2016/00002016/00000008/art00016</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Steganalysis</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Improving Selection-Channel-Aware Steganalysis Features</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib>
          <name>
            <surname>Denemark</surname>
            <given-names>Tomáš</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib>
          <name>
            <surname>Fridrich</surname>
            <given-names>Jessica</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib>
          <name>
            <surname>Comesaña-Alfaro</surname>
            <given-names>Pedro</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <day>14</day>
        <month>02</month>
        <year>2016</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>2016</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <fpage>1</fpage>
      <lpage>8</lpage>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>Currently, the best detectors of content-adaptive steganography are built as classifiers trained on examples of cover and stego images represented with rich media models (features) formed by histograms (or co-occurrences) of quantized noise residuals. Recently, it has been shown that
 adaptive steganography can be more accurately detected by incorporating content adaptivity within the features by accumulating the embedding change probabilities (change rates) in the histograms. However, because each noise residual depends on an entire pixel neighborhood, one should accumulate
 the embedding impact on the residual rather than the pixel to which the residual is formally attributed. Following this observation, in this paper we propose the expected value of the residual L<italic><sub>1</sub></italic> distortion as the quantity that should be accumulated in the selection-channel-aware
 version of rich models to improve the detection accuracy. This claim is substantiated experimentally on four modern content-adaptive steganographic algorithms that embed in the spatial domain.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
