<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC '-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.1 20050630//EN' 'http://uploads.ingentaconnect.com/docs/dtd/ingenta-journalpublishing.dtd'>
<article article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="aggregator">72010410</journal-id>
      <journal-title>NIP &amp; Digital Fabrication Conference</journal-title>
      <abbrev-journal-title>nip digi fabric conf</abbrev-journal-title>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2169-4451</issn><issn pub-type="epub"></issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Society for Imaging Science and Technology</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2352/ISSN.2169-4451.2019.35.65</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="sici">2169-4451(20190929)2019:1L.65;1-</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">s14.phd</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="other">/ist/nipdf/2019/00002019/00000001/art00014</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Research Articles</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Mottle evaluation of coated cardboards printed in inkjet</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib>
          <name>
            <surname>Rosalen</surname>
            <given-names>Sandra</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib>
          <name>
            <surname>Backhaus</surname>
            <given-names>Johannes</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <day>29</day>
        <month>09</month>
        <year>2019</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>2019</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>65</fpage>
      <lpage>68</lpage>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>In this study the methods suggested in the standards ISO/TS 15311-2 / ISO/IEC 24790 and the method suggested from FOGRA (M-Score) to measure print mottle were conducted and compared with visual evaluations. The aim was to understand if one of them is more adequate for evaluation of
 mottle in inkjet print on coated cardboards and if pre- and post-treatments on the cardboards have an influence on print mottle.&lt;br/&gt; The measurements showed that the first method has a higher accordance with visual evaluations. A second finding was that a pretreatment with primer and
 post treatment with IR-radiation to improve ink adhesion and drying can also reduce print mottle.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
