<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.1 20050630//EN" "http://uploads.ingentaconnect.com/docs/dtd/ingenta-journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="aggregator">72010410</journal-id>
      <journal-title>NIP &amp; Digital Fabrication Conference</journal-title>
      <abbrev-journal-title>nip digi fabric conf</abbrev-journal-title>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2169-4451</issn><issn pub-type="epub"/>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Society of Imaging Science and Technology</publisher-name>
        <publisher-loc>7003 Kilworth Lane, Springfield, VA 22151, USA</publisher-loc>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2352/ISSN.2169-4451.2002.18.1.art00029_2</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="sici">2169-4451(20020101)2002:2L.549;1-</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">nip_v2002n2/splitsection29.xml</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="other">/ist/nipdf/2002/00002002/00000002/art00029</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Articles</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>A Comparative Study on Analog and Digital Printing Systems Performances</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib>
          <name>
            <surname>Gervasoni</surname>
            <given-names>Jean-Pierre</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib>
          <name>
            <surname>Rousset</surname>
            <given-names>Eliane</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib>
          <name>
            <surname>Baudin</surname>
            <given-names>Gerard</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <day>01</day>
        <month>01</month>
        <year>2002</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>2002</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>549</fpage>
      <lpage>553</lpage>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-year>2002</copyright-year>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>Our work consists in a comparison of various printing systems: offset lithography, analog Matchprint proofing, Rainbow sublimation proofing, Epson 5000 inkjet printing, Docucolor 2045 digital printing.Several paper grades were used (mainly matt and glossy coated papers). With the
 offset process as a reference, the goal was to characterize print rendering for each printing technique by means of colorimetric and densitometric quality parameters. In the first class, we find:- color gamut volumes, in order to decide whether (and to which extent) the standard quadrichromic
 offset process reproducible colors are included within the borders of the other gamuts or not,- color L*a*b* coordinates associated to primaries and to their combinations and corresponding to the same CMYK set of values in the original computer file.The densitometric measurements
 were : solid density, dot gain, and relative contrast index.With the help of a novel method, we can exploit the whole necessary set of informations to automatically calculate all the above figures from experimental data using an IT8-7.3 test chart. This leads to a possibility to classify
 printing systems at least qualitatively: the results show the offset paper has the smallest performance of all the tested systems.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
