<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.1 20050630//EN" "http://uploads.ingentaconnect.com/docs/dtd/ingenta-journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="aggregator">72010410</journal-id>
      <journal-title>NIP &amp; Digital Fabrication Conference</journal-title>
      <abbrev-journal-title>nip digi fabric conf</abbrev-journal-title>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2169-4451</issn><issn pub-type="epub"/>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Society of Imaging Science and Technology</publisher-name>
        <publisher-loc>7003 Kilworth Lane, Springfield, VA 22151, USA</publisher-loc>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2352/ISSN.2169-4451.2000.16.1.art00022_1</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="sici">2169-4451(20000101)2000:1L.90;1-</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">nip_v2000n1/splitsection22.xml</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="other">/ist/nipdf/2000/00002000/00000001/art00022</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Articles</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Filtration and Reciprocity Effects on the Fade Rate of Inkjet Photographic Prints</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib>
          <name>
            <surname>Bugner</surname>
            <given-names>Douglas E.</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib>
          <name>
            <surname>Suminski</surname>
            <given-names>Christine</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <day>01</day>
        <month>01</month>
        <year>2000</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>2000</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>90</fpage>
      <lpage>94</lpage>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-year>2000</copyright-year>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>
        <p>In this study, we examine the effects of filtration and reciprocity on the fade rate of inkjet photographic prints intended for display in the home and/or office environment. Test prints on a variety of ink-receiver combinations were subjected to three different illumination conditions:
 (a) Plexiglas-filtered 5.4 Klux cool white fluorescent (PLIF), (b) Plexiglas-filtered 67 Klux cool white fluorescent (PHIF), and (c) unfiltered 72 Klux cool white fluorescent (UHIF). The primary color patches, secondary color patches, and neutral density patches were monitored at a density
 of 1.0 above D<sub>min</sub> by status A densitometry at specified intervals of time. Plots of &#x394;D vs cumulative exposure were fit to either a natural log or linear function, and fade rates were thus determined. The effect of filtration under high intensity lighting conditions and the effect
 of light intensity (reciprocity) on the different ink-receiver combinations are discussed.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
